Sputtering Recipes - UCSB Nanofab Wiki
Sputtering Recipes - UCSB Nanofab Wiki
Back to Vacuum Deposition Recipes. R1
You will get efficient and thoughtful service from Acetron.
Please see the SignupMonkey Page for a list of currently installed targets.
Tips & Tricks
Ignition Issues
It is somewhat common that you might have a plasma ignition failure at some point. Common remedies for this are to increase the chamber pressure just for the ignition step, then drop dow to the process pressure in the PreClean and/or Dep step. For example, set the ignition step pressure to 10mTorr or 30mT, then during deposition decrease the pressure to 3mTorr and the plasma will stay lit.
Materials Table (Sputter 3)
The recipes below are given as starting points from data obtained in the nanofab. For critical depositions, calibrations are recommended.
Material P(mT) Pow(W) Sub(W) T(C) Ar N2 O2 Height-Tilt(mm) Rate(nm/min) Stress(MPa) Rs(uOhm-cm) n@633nm k@633nm Target Consumed Lower Limit Data Below Comment Au - - - - - - - - - - - - - Set: 200 WRead: 400 VDC
no Al2O3 3 200 (RF2) off 20 30 1.5 1.52"-4mm 5.32 1. 0 no Demis D. John Co 10(5) 200 0 20 25 0 0 25-9 2.3 - - - - yes Alex K Cr 5 200 0 20 25 0 0 44-4 6.84 - - - - no Brian Cu 1.5 50(395v) 0 20 25 0 0 25-9 4.15 - - - - no Ning Cu 5 150(~490v) 0 20 15 0 0 0.82"-9 8 - - - - yes Ning Fe 10(5) 200 0 20 25 0 0 25-9 1.25 - - - - No Alex K Mo 3 200 0 20 25 0 0 44-4 13.15 - - - - yes Ning Ni 5 150 0 20 25 0 0 44-4 5.23 - - - - yes Ning Ni 5 150 0 20 25 0 0 25-9 1.82 - - - - yes Ning Ni 5 75 0 20 25 0 0 44-4 2.50 - - - - yes Ning Ni 3 200 0 20 25 0 0 44-4 9.4 - - - - yes Ning Ni 1.5 50(399v) 0 20 25 0 0 25-9 0.96 - - - - no Ning Pt 3 50 0 20 25 0 0 0.82"-9 2.9 - - - - no Ning Si 8 250 0 25 25 0 0 15-3 1.4 - - - - no Gerhard - ramp 2W/s - 3% Unif 4" wafer SiN 3 200 10 20 25 3 0 25-9 1.56 - - 1.992 - yes Brian SiN 3 250 10 20 25 2.5 0 25-9 2.1 - - 2.06 - yes Brian SiO2 3 200 10 20 25 0 3 25-9 3.68 - - 1.447 - yes Brian SiO2 3 200 10 20 25 0 5 45-3 2.60 - - 1.471 - yes Brian SiO2 3 250 10 20 25 0 2.5 25-9 4.3 - - 1.485 - yes Brian Ta 5 150 0 20 25 0 0 44-4 9.47 - - - - yes Ning Ta 5 75 0 20 25 0 0 44-4 5.03 - - - - yes Ning Ti 3 100 0 20 25 0 0 25-9 1.34 - - - - yes Ning SampleClean-NativeSiO2 10 0 18 20 25 0 0 44-4 - - - - - yes 150Volts 5 minHeight Conversion for Older Recipes
Old recipes using the manual Height setting in millimeters can be converted to the new programmatic settings in inches as follows:
Old (mm) New (inches) Typical Gun Tilt (mm) 15 25 0.82 9 44 1.52 4Interpolation plot can be found here.
Fe and Co Deposition (Sputter 3)
Cu Deposition (Sputter 3)
Mo Deposition (Sputter 3)
Ni and Ta Deposition (Sputter 3)
SiO2 Deposition (Sputter 3)
SiN Deposition (Sputter 3)
Ti Deposition (Sputter 3)
Please see the SignupMonkey page for a list of currently installed targets.
Materials Table (Sputter 4)
The recipes below are given as starting points from data obtained in the nanofab. For critical depositions, calibrations are recommended.
Material P(mT) Power Source Pow(W) Sub(W) T(C) Ar N2 O2 Height-Tilt(mm) Rate(nm/min) Stress(MPa) Rs(uOhm-cm) n@633nm k@633nm Data Below Comment Al 5 200 0 20 45 0 0 H2.75-T5 4.4 - - - - Yes Ning Cao Al2O3 3 RF4-Sw1 200 0 20 30 0 1.5 H2.75-T5 5.1 1. 0 partial Demis D. John Au 5 200 0 20 45 0 0 H1-T10 17.7 - - - - Yes Ning Cao Au 10 200 0 20 45 0 0 H2.75-T5 35.5 - - - - Yes Demis: 200W rate (Max for Au) -08-03 Cu 5 150 0 20 30 0 0 H0.82-T9 6.7 No (SEM available) Ning Cao Nb 4 250 0 20 30 0 0 H2.00-T7 7.5 - - - - No Pt 5 200 0 20 45 0 0 H2.75-T5 7.4 - - - - Yes Ning Cao Pt 3 50(439V) 0 20 45 0 0 H2.75-T5 3.9 - - - - Yes Ning Cao Ru 3 200 45 H2.75-T4 ~10 Yes Ning Cao Ti 10 200 0 20 45 0 0 H2.75-T5 2.3 - - - - Yes Ning Cao TiN 3 150 110V 20 48.25 1.75 0 H2.5-T5 2 - 60 - - No TiO2 3 250(RF:450V) 0 20 45 0 3 H2.75-T5 4.3 - - - Yes Ning Cao TiW 4.5 200 0 20 45 0 0 H1-T10 4.7 - - - - Yes Ning Cao TiW 4.5 300 0 75 45 0 0 H2.75-T5 9.5 -150 to 150 60 - - Yes 10%Ti by Wt W 3 300 0 50 45 0 0 H2.75-T5 11.5 -150 to 150 11 - - Yes Jeremy WatcherAu Deposition (Sputter 4)
Al Deposition (Sputter 4)
Al2O3 Deposition (Sputter 4)
- Rate: 5.134 nm/min
- Cauchy Refractive Index Params (fit from λ=190-nm, indicating transparency over this range)
- A = 1.626
- B = 5.980E-3
- C = 1.622E-4
Pt Deposition (Sputter 4)
Ru Deposition (Sputter 4)
Ti-Au Deposition (Sputter 4)
TiO2 Deposition (Sputter 4)
TiW Deposition (Sputter 4)
W-TiW Deposition (Sputter 4)
Please see the SignupMonkey page for a list of currently installed targets.
Contact us to discuss your requirements of sio2 sputtering. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.
Materials Table (Sputter 5)
The recipes below are given as starting points from data obtained in the nanofab. For critical depositions, calibrations are recommended.
Material P(mT) Power Source Pow(W) Sub(V) T(C) Ar N2 O2 Height-Tilt(mm) Rate(nm/min) Stress(MPa) Rs(uOhm-cm) Rq(nm) n@633nm k@633nm LPDb/LPDa* Data Below Comment Al 5 250 0 20 45 0 0 H1-T10 2.5 22 No (SEM available) Ning Al2O3 1.5 DC5-SW1 150 - - 45 - 5 H2.75-T5 5.3 ? ? ? 1.641 - ? No Demis -04-13 Cr 5.0 RF 200 ~345 20 45 H2.75-T5 4.47 No BT -07-02 Pt 3.0 200(507v) - - 45 - - H1-T10 7.03 ? ? ? 2.068 4.951 ? No Ning -09-27 SiO2 3 250 120 20 45 0 2 H1.0-T10 2.32 - - 1.49 - 153/ No Biljana SiO2 3 250 120 20 45 0 4.5 H1.0-T10 2.29 -515 - 0.210 1.49 138/ No ( AFM available) Biljana SiO2 3 250 120 20 45 0 6 H1.0-T10 2.32 - - 1.49 - 27/ Yes Biljana Ti 3.0 200(374v) - - 45 - - H1-T10 2.52 ? ? ? 2.679 1.853 ? No Ning -09-27*LPD: light particle detection:
- LPDb: light particle detection before deposition
- LPDa: light particle detection after deposition
SiO2 Deposition (Sputter 5)
Ion-Beam Assisted Deposition - high density reactive sputtering for dielectric film stacks, with angled/rotating fixtures.
- Method to calibrate multi-layer optical films: For example, for calibrating and depositing Multi-layer DBR gratings, Anti-Reflection coatings etc.
IBD Process Control Plots - Plots of all process control data.
SiO2 deposition (IBD)
SiO2 Thin-Film Properties (IBD)
- Dep.rate: 5.2 nm/min (users must calibrate this prior to critical deps)
- HF Etch Rate ~350 nm/min
- Stress -390MPa (compressive)
- Refractive Index: 1.494
- Cauchy Parameters (350-nm):
- A = 1.480
- B = 0.
- C = -3.e-5
SiO2 Uniformity
Measured in June (Demis D. John)
Uniformity Statistics Thickness (nm) Refractive Index(at 632nm)
Mean (Avg.), nm .80 1.480 Min .09 1.479 Max .9 1.482 Std. Deviation (nm) 5.99 8.6e-4 Credit: Demis D. John, -06-15Plot of SiO2 thickness and refractive index measured across 6-inch wafer, measured with ellipsometry.
Si3N4 deposition (IBD)
Si3N4 Thin-Film Properties (IBD)
- Deposition Rate: 4.10 nm/min (users must calibrate this prior to critical deps)
- HF Etch Rate: ~11nm/min
- Stress -MPa (compressive)
- Refractive Index: 1.969
- Cauchy Parameters (350-nm):
- A = 2.000
- B = 0.
- C = 1.e-4
Ta2O5 deposition (IBD)
Ta2O5 Thin-Film Properies (IBD)
- Ta2O5 1hr depositions:
- Deposition Rate: 7.8 nm/min (users must calibrate this prior to critical deps)
- HF Etch Rate 2 nm/min
- Stress -232MPa (compressive)
- Refractive Index: 2.172
- Cauchy Parameters (350-nm):
- A = 2.
- B = 0.
- C = -0.
Al2O3 deposition (IBD)
- Al2O3 [IBD] Standard Recipe - "1_Al2O3_dep"
- Al2O3 [IBD] Process Control Data
Al2O3 Thin-Film Properties (IBD)
- Deposition Rate 2.05nm/min (users must calibrate this prior to critical deps)
- HF etch rate 167nm/min
- Stress -332MPa (compressive)
- Refractive Index: 1.656
- Cauchy Parameters (350-nm):
- A = To Be Added
- B =
- C =
- Absorbing < ~350nm
TiO2 deposition (IBD)
TiO2 Thin-Film Properties (IBD)
- Deposition Rate: 1.29 nm/min (users must calibrate this prior to critical deps)
- HF etch rate ~5.34nm/min
- Stress -445MPa (compressive)
- Refractive Index: 2.259
- Cauchy Parameters (350-nm):
- A = 2.435
- B = -4.e-4
- C = 0.
- Absorbing < ~350nm wavelength
SiOxNy deposition (IBD)
These are some old (), initial characterizations only. A recipe improvement would be to increase the Assist O2+N2 = 60sccm total, increasing repeatability by getting away from the low-flow limit of the MFC's. Data provided by Demis D. John, .
xNy: Refractive Index vs. O2/N2 Flow.IBD SiO: Refractive Index vs. O2/N2 Flow.
xNy vs. Assist O2 flow.Dep. Rate of IBD SiOvs. Assist Oflow.
Standard Cleaning Procedure (IBD)
You must edit the "#_GridClean"("#" is your group number) steps in your Process according to the following times:
- 5min GridClean for 1hr or less deposition
- 10min GridClean for up to 2hrs of dep.
- Do not deposit for longer than 2hrs - instead break up your Process into multiple 2-hr subroutines with cleans in between. See the recipe "1_SiO2_Dep_Multi" for an example.
Standard Grid-Clean Recipe
To Be Added
This Tool has been Disabled, and is not available for use any more! These recipes are displayed here for historical/reference purposes only.
Al Deposition (Sputter 2)
AlNx Deposition (Sputter 2)
Au Deposition (Sputter 2)
TiO2 Deposition (Sputter 2)
Arching Concerns When Sputtering SiO2
Recently a customer asked about continuously running an SiO2 Sputtering Target and specifically concerns about arcing.
There is always going to be some re-deposition onto a sputtering target where stray molecules that have been knocked off the target surface reattach back onto the target surface. In your case, using a non-magnetron planar diode cathode assembly with an rf generator this should not be an issue. The ions should be striking the target surface randomly and not in any selected area of the target surface. The rf generator should provide an even, homogeneous plasma uniformly across the entire target surface, bombarding both re-deposited and virgin areas of the SiO2 target surface randomly and equally. The resultant films may vary a bit in stoichiometry as the re-deposited (Si)x(O2-x) areas of the target surface may be slightly silicon rich or oxygen rich depending on the volume of the partial pressure of the oxygen added to the argon working gas, but this should NOT affect the ability of the sputtering process to sustain a constant uniform plasma and deposition.
If there is arcing, you may be building up material within the gap between the dark space shield and the target surface. This should be around 1-3mm or so and the dark space shield should always protrude beyond the target surface by about 3mm or so. Keep this gap area clean, even if it means sanding or abrading the components occasionally. Arcing means that the plasma is going to ground potential for some reason. Make certain that the reflected power on your rf generator is not drifting up with time. This must be kept at absolute zero. Is your rf generator set at constant voltage, constant current or constant power? Check and see if both the current and the voltage are remaining constant over time at whatever power level you are using. Something may be changing. If the impedance in the target is changing, due to re-deposition and/or target thickness changes (becoming thinner over time), the power supply and the tuning network needs to compensate accordingly to maintain an equilibrium balance within the plasma.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit sputtering target materials.